Isnin, 4 Januari 2010

ڤوساك ايهندا: Pendedahan rakaman Anwar Ibrahim berkempen untuk kristian menggunakan nama ALLAH

ڤوساك ايهندا: Pendedahan rakaman Anwar Ibrahim berkempen untuk kristian menggunakan nama ALLAH

Disinilah tembelang Anuar Ibrahim. 
Masuklah ke link diatas dan saksikanlah sendiri.

Kembara Politik: Kalimah 'Allah': Kerana Pulut Santan Binasa...

Kembara Politik: Kalimah 'Allah': Kerana Pulut Santan Binasa...

Tulisan yang jelas dan menarik dapat dibaca dilink di atas dikaitkan di sini untuk memudahkan sahabat sahabat menemuinya.

PAS menyokong penggunaan Kalimah ALLAH dalam Herald Tribune Malaysia, sebuah penerbitan dari pihak Gereja.

Di bawah ini adalah apa yang dapat hamba salinkan dari Herald Malaysia Online.Com. Semuga ia memudahkan sahabat sahabat membaca meneliti sendiri. Dan carilah pengesahan sendiri.

Malaysian Islamic party supports Catholic fight to use 'Allah'
Published On December 17 , 2009
 Comments(2)  |    Mail  |    Print  |   
 
Islamic councils allowed to fight Catholic church over ‘Allah’

 Pope: God is present in every moment of life
Stephanie March
The Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) says it supports the Catholic Church's fight to overturn a government ban on the use of the term 'Allah' to describe God in Christian texts.

Malaysia's high court is due to rule on the issue at the end of this month, ending a two year legal battle.

The government says the use of the word could insult and enrage Muslims and lead to public disorder.

Zulfikar Ahmad from Islamic Party PAS says the Church has a constitutional right to use the term, and it is not forbidden in the Koran.

"I personally believe and PAS as well believe the way forward for a mutually respecting religious relationship, especially in a plural, multi-racial and multicultural society like Malaysia is not to deny outrightly the right of others to use the name of Allah."

In 2007, the Church launched the legal challenge on behalf of the Catholic Herald, a weekly publication distributed amongst Malaysia's 850,000 Catholics.

The government has been arguing that the word should be used exclusively by Muslims.

Editor of the Catholic Herald, Father Lawrence Andrew says 'Allah' has been used by the Church in Malaysia for centuries.

Constitutional right

He says he has a constitutional right to keep using it in the Malay-language edition of the paper.

"There is a new movement in the last 20 years where they have begun to stress that Allah belongs to Muslims," he said.

"It is a slow gradual claim of the word, so therefore we are being pushed backwards, pushed aside, we are being marginalised."

The Herald is not the only publication directly affected by the ban.

This year the Malaysian government blocked the import of thousands of Malay-language Bibles because they used the word 'Allah" to refer to God.

The government says allowing Catholics to refer to Allah could confuse, insult, or enrage Muslims, leading to public disorder.

But Father Lawrence disagrees.

"Has this word in Malaysia created any disturbance for last 400 years or 500 years? Not at all so how do we arrive at a situation that this word will cause disharmony... when over centuries, nothing has happened?"

Public support for ban

Dr Shad Faruqi, a constitutional law professor from the University of Technology MARA , says there's widespread public support for the ban.

"A number of Muslim religious groups have joined forces to seek to appear before the court to submit arguments and the judge has been trying to contain the number of groups that are trying to intervene," he said.

While the Malaysian constitution has provisions to protect freedom of speech and religion, Dr Faruqi says Malaysian law allows the government to restrict these activities to maintain public order.

"The public order implication for Malaysia is this - if someone were to say 'Allah was born of Mary, Allah was crucified"...all the attributes of Christian God were attributed to Allah some Muslims may feel offended."

Some of the groups supporting the ban also believe the Church is using the term in an effort to proselytise amongst Muslims, which can be deemed illegal.

While the Catholic Church may have a constitutional right to use the word, Dr Farqui says in a diverse country like Malaysia the Church could use discretion and use a different word.

"I personally think there is no serious implication for freedom of religion if they don't use the word Allah."

"They could use the word Tohan. This is a case of using a right. I think it is not always right to make use of ones rights. I think sometimes the need for social harmony is important."

The judge presiding over the case is due to hand down his finding on December 30.


Courtesy: Australian Network News

To whom it may concern. If this copy ia not allowed please inform us. We will immediately delete this posting upon receipt of such notification. Thanks.

Khamis, 31 Disember 2009

Komunis ----- sedang menyerang ????

Malam tadi hamba membaca beberapa catatan di laman Sosialis Hijau. Hamba cuba meninggalkan sedikit catatan tetapi ia adalah laman tertutup dan dibuka khas untuk ahli ahlinya sahaja. Hamba pun cuba salin untuk diulas dilaman ini. Itupun terhalang. 

Apakah kemahiran hamba terlalu dangkal atau memang mereka memang cuma nak kata sahaja. Tudak sudi mendengar. Maka hamba pun membuat keputusan menutup minat hamba untuk membaca catatan catatan berterabur sejak semalam dan malam ini juga itu. Adilkan ?? 

Cuma hamba masih lagi sudi meninggal pesan kepada Sosialis Hijau: kalau kita ikhlas dalam bicara dilaman terbuka ini bukalah dan kita bicara dengan minda terbuka. Dengan minda tertutup itu macam mana anda akan mendapat minat untuk dapat orang lain ikut pendapat anda yang ditutup itu.



Yang menjadi persoalannya ialah kenapa sejak semalam posting berlapis tindan muncul dilaman Sosialis Hijau. Semuanya berbicarakan sokongan kepada Ching Peng Komunis sambil mengutuk kita dan Negara kita ini. Tetapi mereka bercakap satu hala dan tudak berminat untuk melihat pandangan orang lain terhadap apa yang mereka lontarkan itu. 

Apakah itu cara kasar komunis. Apakah pembicara dan pengendalinya adalah penganut tegal fahaman dan cara komunis. Dan kenapa tiba tiba sejak semalam serangan mereka bermula dan begitu bertalu talu sekali. Apakah ini menunjukkan apa apa.

Jumaat, 25 Disember 2009

SMS DARI AHLI PAS


Lepas Isyak tadi ada message masuk melalui talipon. Bila buka rupanya ada message dari seorang kenalan yang memanjangkan message yang dia dapat dari seseorang yang dia tidak kenal tetapi mendakwa dia seorang ahli PAS. Menarik juga message itu. Tetapi tak tahu tahap kebenarannya kerana sumbernya adalah tidak diketahui (anonimus). Namun benar atau tidak, tidaklah lama untuk kita ketahui. Cuma kita hanya ada 2 hari sahaja tempoh untuk dapat mempastikan benar atau tidaknya berita itu. Sama samalah kita semak nanti. Messagenya itu adalah seperti berikut:

  • " Gerakan Penyokong dan Pengundi PAS Selangor akan mengadakan perhimpunan mendesak PAS Selangor keluar dari Pakatan Rakyat pada Ahad 27 Dis 09 Jam 11.00 pagi di Pej. Perhubungan PAS Selangor, No 13C, Ting. 3, Blok 1 Worldwide Business Centre, Sek. 13, Shah Alam. Satu memorandum akan diserahkan kepada Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor Dato Hassan Ali. Kami berpendirian kepentingan Islam akan tenggelam dengan PAS dalam PR. Mari hadir beramai2. Tlg sebarkan. "

Panglima Perang Cyber: EDISI KHAS : BPN MENGUTUK TINDAKAN HACKERS MENGGODAM BLOG PEMBELA NEGARA !!!

Pada mulanya hamba sangkakan hamba seorang sahaja yang menjadi mangsa serangan pengecut yang khianat itu. Rupa rupanya ramai yang menjadi mangsa. Untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut bacalah seterusnya dilaman:

  Panglima Perang Cyber: EDISI KHAS : BPN MENGUTUK TINDAKAN HACKERS MENGGODAM BLOG PEMBELA NEGARA !!!

Rabu, 23 Disember 2009

Anugerah "Tokoh Demokrasi" bukti Anwar guna konsultan kempen US

http://analisaringan.blogspot.cpmAnugerah "Tokoh Demokrasi" bukti Anwar guna konsultan kempen US
By aidc editor on December 22, 2009 3:40 AM | 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
JoeNapolitan
Joseph "Joe" Napolitan (kanan) pengasas IAPC, konsultan kempen politik utama di Amerika Syarikat

Oleh NTAnwar, AIDCclub

Selepas Foreign Policy Magazine menamakan Anwar Ibrahim sebagai salah seorang tokoh daripada 100 tokoh pemikir dunia baru-baru ini, sekali lagi Anwar diberi anugerah yang sama di peringkat negara iaitu sebagai "Tokoh Demokrasi".

Majlis penganugerahan "Tokoh Demokrasi" berlangsung di Pusat Konvensyen Shah Alam pada 20 Disember 2009 yang dihadiri oleh Robert Murdoch mewakili IAPC (The International Association of Political Consultants).
Apa itu IAPC ?

IAPC atau The International Association of Political Consultants adalah sebuah Konsultan Politik Antarabangsa yang ditubuhkan di Amerika Syarikat pada tahun 1968. Idea asal penubuhan dicetuskan oleh Joseph Napolitan, sekitar tahun 1960-an, berdasarkan pengalamannya menjadi tokoh penting di sebalik tabir menaikkan tokoh-tokoh penting dalam kerajaan Amerika Syarikat. Antara pengalamannya adalah bekas Pengarah Kempen Presiden Amerika Syarikat, John F Kennedy pada tahun 1960 dan Pengarah Media Kempen Hubert Horatio Humphrey untuk calon Naib Presiden Amerika Syarikat pada tahun 1968. Klik di sini

Khusus sebagai konsultan kempen di Amerika Syarikat, Joseph Napolitan menubuhkan APPC (The American Association of Political Consultants).

Pada tahun 1968, Joseph Napolitan berpakat dengan Michel Bongrand, tokoh konsultan kempen politik dari Peranchis untuk mewujudkan Konsultan Kempen Politik di Peringkat Antarabangsa. Pertemuan di Paris, pada tahun tersebut yang dihadiri oleh tokoh-tokoh kempen politik dari 15 buah negara akhirnya mewujudkan sebuah organisasi dinamakan IAPC. Klik di sini

IAPC berpengkalan di Amerika Syarikat dan mempunyai cawangan-cawangan di negara-negara strategik. Pengerusinya adalah Ben Goddard; Presidennya, Tom Edmonds; Setiausahanya, Faye Diamond dan Bendaharinya adalah Nancy Todd Tyner. Keempat-empat tokoh tersebut adalah dari Amerika Syarikat.Klik di sini

Siapa Robert Murdock ?

Robert Murdock adalah konsultan Amerika Syarikat yang menetap di Indonesia. Beliau merupakan salah seorang Ahli Lembaga Pengarah IAPC [klik di sini] yang dipertanggungjawabkan membuka cawangan IAPC di peringkat Asia yang dinamakan APAPC (The Asia Pacific Association of Political Consultants).

Di peringkat Asia, APAPC ditubuhkan pada tahun 2005 [klik di sini] yang berpusat di dua negara iaitu Australia dan Indonesia [klik di sini]. Kedua-dua pusat operasi itu diuruskan oleh Robert Murdock [klik di sini]

Penasihat utama APAPC adalah Joseph "Joe" Napolitan, warganegara Amerika Syarikat yang menjadi pengasas IAPC dan APPC. Klik di sini


Konsultan Amerika juru kempen Anwar ?

Dengan pemilihan Anwar Ibrahim sebagai "Tokoh Demokrasi" bermakna mengesahkan badan konsultan Amerika Syarikat sudah mengesahkan siapakah tokoh yang menjadi pilihan mereka untuk dikempen sebagai bakal Perdana Menteri Malaysia pada masa akan datang.

Itu merupakan isyarat yang sangat jelas dan Anwar terlalu gembira dengan pemilihan itu sehinggakan menwar-warkan secara terbuka di blognya. Klik di sini di sini dan di sini

Pada tahun 2007, Robert Murdock dan IAPC telah memberi anugerah yang sama kepada Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) dari Indonesia. [Klik di sini] Anugerah yang diberikan kepada SBY itu diberikan sempena dengan Persidangan Dunia IAPC ke-40 di Bali, Indonesia. Dalam persidangan itu, Anwar Ibrahim bersama Dr Colin Rubenstein [Executive Director of the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC)] merupakan antara tenaga penceramahnya. Klik di sini dan di sini

Kesan pemilihan SBY sebagai "Tokoh Demokrasi" sangat penting kepada survival politiknya. Kesan paling utama SBY mempunyai pelobi, jurukempen dan konsultan pemikir dari Amerika Syarikat. Akibatnya dalam pemilihan jawatan Presiden Indonesia, Robert Murdock dan IAPC menjadi juru kempen di sebalik tabir SBY yang membolehkan beliau mengekalkan jawatannya sebagai Presiden Indonesia.

Murdock mengiktiraf Indonesia dan SBY sebagai model "Demokrasi" dan "Kebebasan" di Asia.[klik di sini]. Pujian dan kempen besar-besaran Murdock kepada SBY akan menaikkan imej tokoh itu di peringkat antarabangsa khususnya di Amerika Syarikat.

Sebab itu jika dibandingkan dengan dua peristiwa yang muncul serentak kepada Anwar dalam bulan Disember ini, Anwar tidak begitu teruja dengan kedatangan Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi, ulama tersohor dari Mesir yang datang ke Malaysia, jika dibandingkan dengan kedatangan Robert Murdock yang datang dari Amerika Syarikat.

Anwar lebih teruja dengan kunjungan Robert Mudock yang memberi anugerah "Tokoh Demokrasi" kepadanya. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan beberapa penulisan 'penuh ghairah' di blognya.

Sebab itu, semasa berceramah di Pusat Konvesnyen Putrajaya, anjuran JAKIM, Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi membangkitkan soal masa depan Islam di Indonesia. Walaupun Murdock memuji Indonesia sebagai "Negara Demokrasi dan Kebebasan", tetapi Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi melihat sebaliknya, di mana terdapat ancaman besar kepada masa depan Islam apabila perjuangan bertunjangkan "Demokrasi" dan "Kebebasan".

Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi menceritakan pengalamannya sendiri berada di Indonesia, di mana di hotel-hotel hanya dibekalkan dengan kitab Injil. Ini merupakan proses kristianisasi secara halus, kata ulama tersohor itu.

Hadiah amat besar kepada Anwar tahun ini adalah anugerah "Tokoh Demokrasi" dari Robert Murdock. Bermakna, mulai saat ini, Anwar boleh tidur bermimpikan mahligai Putrajaya, kerana Murdock telah melakukan pekara yang sama kepada SBY sebagai Presiden Indonesia.

sumber - NTAnwar

Artikel lain berkaitan :

1. Kenapa Anwar Ibrahim tak jadi bersumpah di depan Dr Yusof Al Qaradawi ?

2. Terbongkar semula : Anwar arah DNA Afifa ditukar ?

3. Anwar : Ada apa dengan BTN ?

4. Nasib baik Anwar tidak jadi Presiden PAS


Categories:


JANGAN CERITA NANTI JADI PERKAUMAN.


Rupert Murdock dan Anuar Ibrahim
 





Rockfeller dan Li Chang
 
 
Jangan cerita apa apa nanti kita menjadi perkauman.

Sabtu, 19 Disember 2009

PETRIOTISMA vs CHOVANISMA ?

Dalam melayari laman laman fb anak anak yang sedang seronok berbicara tentang petriotisma setelah menerima sedikit kejutan yang membawa kesedaran; tiba tiba hamba terserempak dengan satu komen yang cukup menarik. Oleh kerana ia cukup menarik hamba petik dan perturunkan dibawah ini untuk tatapan dan pandangan kawan kawan yang berminat seperti hamba sendiri.

Lokahawa- Chai
oi.. ming chai la.. i wont slim down .. d sky will topple.. 2012 will become reality. impossible.. ?

haha

ok ok. hope c ya again. jzu hope for our result la. hope for all d best la. reli....

God bless le~


Apa yang sahabat sahabat fahami dari catatan ini ? Dipaparkan untuk kita semua olah bersama. Silakan.

Khamis, 17 Disember 2009

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Federal Reserve Bank

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Federal Reserve Bank

    Important Caveat: This article should be read in conjunction with these articles, Debunking Federal Reserve Myths. Edward Griffin, a well-known Federal Reserve researcher and no friend of the Federal Reserve, has questioned the alleged JFK assassination/EO 11110 connection, given in the article below. I am in absolutely no doubt that the Kennedy assassination was a conspiracy in which Lee Harvey Owald was almost definitely the “patsy”. But I am not convinced that signing EO 11110 was the reason. And while the Lincoln letter that Wes Penre quotes in his article is probably authentic, the version which Rick Crawford gives in his article on its authenticity does not contain the following words, which Penre includes: “The money powers preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me & the financial institutions at the rear, the latter is my greatest foe.” I will be contacting both Penre and Crawford for further elucidation on this issue.

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Federal Reserve Bank
by Wes Penre, Nov 22, 2003

Since that dreadful day on November 22nd of 1963 when JFK was assassinated, there have been lots of speculations as to why and by whom he was murdered. You may think that you have heard it all, and that we don’t need another theory. However, I have researched JFK quite a bit; especially with regards to the assassination, and I have come up with a different, and not very widely discussed possibility for the killing; with a parallel that goes back almost a hundred years in time.

JFK was a very controversial President; he wanted to change things around. By doing so, you can’t please everyone, and he stepped on quite a few toes. One thing he wanted to do was to re-organize the CIA from within, because he considered the Agency being a Government within the Government, with too much power. Allen Dulles, who was the head of the CIA at the time did not like the idea of course, and this alone could have been the reason for the assassination. But there is another interesting aspect as well…

To understand this theory we must understand that the real power is not with the politicians, but with the International Bankers. They are the ones that control this country behind the scenes. You and I can try to run for Presidency if we want to, but we would not stand much of a chance. It is not because we don’t have good ideas, or are incapable, but we don’t have the right powerful sponsors. The final candidates are the ones that are chosen by the International Bankers and sponsored by them. The rest of the candidates cannot afford to compete. Also, the same sponsors support both candidates, and can therefore keep almost total control over the election.

Most people know that the FEDERAL Reserve bank is creating the US dollars. But the truth is that the Federal Reserve is not federal at all, but owned by twelve super-wealthy International Banking families, such as the Rothschild’s and the Rockefellers. This is a well hidden secret, but can even be verified in “Encyclopedia Britannica”, and by the statements in this article, as we shall see. This setup is against the US Constitution, where the government is supposed to create our money (the 16th Amendment), which should be backed up by gold and silver.

What JFK did was to create interest-free government money, backed up by the silver reserve, contrary to the Federal Reserve money, which is not backed up by anything as we will see. He wanted to pay off the US debt this way. He obviously knew the secret about the Federal Reserve, and decided to follow the Constitution. Of course, this was a very dangerous thing to do, because if he was allowed to continue, it could put the International bankers out of business in the long run. So this was even more serious than to reorganize the CIA. Interestingly, soon after the assassination the interest-free money was taken out of circulation [1]. Kennedy signed a not very well known Executive Order, no 11110[2] in June of 1963, four months before the assassination (also, click here to read ALL Executive Orders JFK wrote throughout his Presidency, ordered by numbers).

This Order returned to the Government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve Bank. Kennedy gave the Treasury the power to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury. In plain language this means that for every ounce of silver in the US Treasury vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. JFK brought nearly $4.3 billion U.S. notes[3] into circulation. So by signing this Executive Order, he was about to put the Federal Reserve Bank (and with them all the International Bankers) out of business.
The Federal Reserve Notes would eventually not be in demand anymore, and by doing so, Mr. Kennedy probably also signed his own death warrant. Executive Order 110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed up by silver. Maybe the assassination of President Kennedy was a warning to successors not to “make the same mistake” as this courageous President did. Brilliance is only allowed and acknowledged if it serves the Illuminati Agenda.

Although Mr. Kennedy was of an Illuminati bloodline and probably also an occultist at some level, and even involved in practices common man would disagree with, I believe he was a man of honor when it came to politics and taking his job seriously. Being a Kennedy was enough for the International Bankers to sponsor him, thinking he would adjust to the Agenda. But time told them they had made a mistake and put a person in power who refused to abide and had his own ideas, ready to execute them. The same thing goes for his brother Robert, and his son John F. Kennedy Jr., who threatened to reveal the Secret behind Power shortly before he had his “accident”.

It is very interesting to see that all those three people are now dead before their time, while Edward (Ted) Kennedy is still alive, being the one who goes in his father Joe’s footsteps to bring the New World Order into a reality. The attempt to end the Vietnam War (which was a very profitable war for the bankers) by 1965 would severely have cut the profits of the private owned Federal Reserve Bank and the banking establishment.

Then, of course, the fact that both JFK and Lincoln met the same end is a mere coincidence(!)

The Warren Commission, which investigated the killing, consisted of a number of people, who would probably have wanted to see the President dead; one of them was Allen Dulles(!) and another one was the President-to-be, Gerald Ford, a 33° Freemason. Cover-up? Well, the reason people in power are assassinated varies, of course, but is always an indication that other higher powers are at work, often hidden from the public. And today, not many people believe that the assassination was not a conspiracy of some sort.

An investigation also showed that very few people think that the Kennedy assassination will ever be resolved. However, thirty-three years after the Warren Commission was held, former President Gerald Ford, as one of the key members of the Commission, was forced to admit that the Warren Report was fictionalized[4].

An interesting thing, which makes the Federal Reserve theory considerable, is a parallel 98 years from the year JFK was killed. In 1865 another US President was assassinated. His name was Abraham Lincoln. What did he do before the assassination? Well, he created government interest-free money, so called greenback dollars, to pay off the debt from the Civil War. Shortly after he was killed, the greenbacks were taken out of circulation[5]…

Lincoln was well aware of what was happening, as shown in this letter:

    “I see in the near future a crisis approaching. It unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. The money powers preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me & the financial institutions at the rear, the latter is my greatest foe. Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed.”[6]

[1] Lyndon B. Johnson’s first act on the plane (Air Force One), after being sworn in on the flight [Jackie was standing next to him, still in shock], was to put back into effect the Federal Reserve Act that Kennedy had revoked and paid the one billion buy out clause that was part of that act. Johnson nullified the reason JFK was murdered just so he could be president. He had already set up with the Rothschild’s (International Banker Family) a deal to put him in office if he repealed the nullification of Fed Act.

[2] Click here to see the JFK Executive Order 11110. Also, see the following article for more information: President John F. Kennedy, The Federal Reserve And Executive Order 11110 .

[3] Definition of ‘note(s)’

[4] www.illuminati-news.com/ford-and-warren-report.htm

[5] More on this issue here: http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/pres.htm

[6] raham Lincoln, letter to William Elkins, Nov 21, 1864 (after the passage of the debt causing National Bank Act [June 3, 1864])